Benefits & Wearers’ Experiences

Hierarchy of Importance

for making a successful progressive lens
There is a lot of confusion in our industry about which parameters are the most important towards supplying a successfully dispensed RX progressive. Not surprisingly, those items directly controlled by the ECP are still the most important! Base curve and lens index material play a role more important than factors such as customization and individualization.
 

Benefits for Patients
1.
 Better vision in all zones compared to SV Blank
2.
 Latest technology - Camber’s two-surface
design is unique and patented
3.
 Fully customizable - every variable
that affects vision can be
individualized to patient
4.
 Improved reading area - more
spacious, easier to find with the eye
5.
 Easier adaptation - study shows
quicker adaptation for most
wearers.
6.
 Wearers prefer Camber
study shows more wearers
preferred lenses made
from Camber blanks to
lenses made from
single vision blanks.

Benefits for Opticians and Labs
1.
 Superior optics - wide open fields of vision
2.
 Convenient stocking - small number of
blanks in stock, just like SV blanks
3.
 Premium technology - feel confident
that the product you are dispensing
is as technologically advanced as
any lens on the market
4.
 Standard processing - processing
similar to standard digital progressives
5.
 Easier frame selection - higher
base curve prescriptions have
fewer frame limitations
6.
 Better looking - more
cosmetically appealing
front curve (flatter) for
many high plus and high
add prescriptions

 

Wearers’ Experiences
In a double-blind study, test wearers compared conventional single vision blanks with Camber blanks, each processed with exactly the same digital progressive design. test lens
A

(processed from
single vision blanks)		 test lens
B

(processed from
Camber blanks)

Wearer comparison study
1.
Test wearers wore each pair of glasses for the duration of one week, but were not aware of which lenses they were wearing for the entirety of
the study.
2.
Both pairs of lenses were of identical material and base curve, and mounted in the same frame.
3.
Wearers were surveyed about their experience with the lenses after testing them both.

Study results



100%

wearers reported

near zone easier
to find

with Camber lenses


94%

wearers reported

near vision quality
equal or better

with Camber lenses


83%

wearers reported

EASIER
ADAPTATION

with Camber lenses

© Copyright Younger Optics"